Recent Case Results - Successful Outcomes in Robbery, Burglary, Probation, Possession, and Sex Crimes Cases

Our Philadelphia criminal defense lawyers have continued to obtain successful results on behalf of our clients in cases involving sex crimes, robbery, burglary, and Possession with the Intent to Deliver. These successful outcomes have included bail reductions, the dismissal of all charges, favorable results in pre-trial Motions to Suppress, and probationary and house arrest sentences. In the past two months alone, we have achieved a number of wins, including:

Commonwealth v. S.A. - S.A. was charged with rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, sexual assault, and related charges. The magistrate initially set bail at an extremely high amount due to the seriousness of the charges, and SA was unable to make bail. Within 24 hours of being retained, Attorney Goldstein obtained a significant bail reduction, and the defendant was able to make bail. After the defendant made bail, Attorney Goldstein was also able to have all charges dismissed at the preliminary hearing.

Commonwealth v. H.S. - Our criminal defense lawyers were able to obtain a full dismissal of all charges in a burglary case against HS at the preliminary hearing.

Commonwealth v. S.V. - Our attorneys were able to obtain a sentence of house arrest and drug treatment for a defendant who was convicted of drug charges. After the defendant was convicted of Possession with the Intent to Deliver, our defense attorneys arranged for the defendant's other open matters, including a case for which the defendant was on probation, to be brought in before the sentencing judge so that the defendant could be sentenced on all of the cases at the same time and only have one back judge. This procedure is called a 701 consolidation, and it can be very helpful in terms of avoiding multiple probation judges and consecutive sentences for a defendant who has violated probation.

Although the sentencing guidelines called for a state prison sentence and the defendant had been on probation at the time of the new arrest, our defense attorneys were able to convince the sentencing judge to give the defendant a chance to serve a house arrest sentence and obtain drug treatment. By investigating the client's background, our lawyers learned that despite being on probation for a similar offense, the defendant had never been ordered to undergo any kind of addiction treatment. Now, instead of serving time in state prison, the client will have the chance to receive treatment in the community, and the Court will also assist the client with obtaining educational and job training.

Commonwealth v S.A. - Attorney Goldstein obtained a full dismissal of all charges in a Robbery case at the preliminary hearing. In this case, the complainant alleged that the defendant had been part of a group that assaulted him and stole his tablet. After the complainant testified that he had been under the influence of prescription medication at the time of the incident and was no longer sure if the defendant had been present, Attorney Goldstein was able to convince the preliminary hearing judge to dismiss all charges. Prior to the preliminary hearing, Attorney Goldstein obtained a significant bail reduction which allowed the client to fight the case from out of custody.

Cmmonwealth v. D.S. - Our attorneys successfully moved for a bail reduction in a felony gun possession case. After the judge at the preliminary hearing refused to reduce bail, Attorney Goldstein immediately moved for a bail reduction in the Court of Common Pleas, and the Common Pleas judge reduced bail from $35,000 to $15,000.

In Re: J.W.: We negotiated an admission to Criminal Trespass in a juvenile delinquency case where the client was originally charged with felony burglary for breaking and entering into a school after hours. After hearing the defense's mitigation evidence and recommendation at disposition (sentencing), the Family Court judge found that the client was not in need of supervision and dismissed all of the charges. The defendant will not even have to be on probation, and the entire record of the case can be expunged.

Commonwealth v. E.G. - All charges dismissed prior to trial in domestic violence case involving Simple Assault and Recklessly Endangering Another Person charges.

Commonwealth v. M.M. - Client was arrested on a potential technical probation violation. Attorney Goldstein filed a motion to lift the detainer and had a hearing scheduled within a week. At the hearing, our defense attorneys convinced the judge to find that the client had not violated the terms of his probation. The client was immediately released the same day.

Commonwealth v. W.L. - The defendant was arrested on a bench warrant due to a failure to show up for court for a preliminary hearing. Our attorneys were able to have the bench warrant lifted without a finding of contempt of court and obtain Sign on Bond bail, meaning the defendant was released without an increase in bail.

Commonwealth v B.M. - We were able to successfully have Possession with the Intent to Deliver PCP and Conspiracy charges dismissed, leaving only charges related to marijuana sales for trial.

Commonwealth v. J.W. - Our defense attorneys obtained the dismissal of charges of selling crack cocaine and conspiracy at a preliminary hearing. The defendant will now face much less serious charges related only to marijuana in a trial in the Municipal Court. A conviction for Possession with the Intent to Deliver of crack cocaine may often involve jail time, whereas even a conviction for PWID of marijuana in the Municipal Court is more likely to result in probation.

Commonwealth v. M.G. - Successfully negotiated Section 17 disposition on drug possession charges. The Section 17 program requires the defendant to plead no contest and be placed on a period of probation. If the defendant successfully completes the probation, then the charges will be dismissed and can be expunged.

Commonwealth v. A.C. - Successfully negotiated for client who was facing assault charges to obtain entry into a Domestic Violence diversion program. If the client pays a small fine, completes a number of counseling sessions, and stays out of trouble for approximately four months, the entire case will be dismissed and can be expunged. Pursuant to the terms of the program, the client was not required to enter into any kind of plea or admission of guilt.

Commonwealth v. J.H. - Successfully negotiated for client's entry into drug treatment court for client facing two cases of Possession with the Intent to Deliver. If client completes the program, the charges will be dismissed and can be expunged, and client will not have a felony record.

Recent Case Results

Recent Case Results

The Philadelphia criminal defense lawyers of Goldstein Mehta LLC have had several recent successes in the courtroom. These outcomes have included acquittals, successful motions to suppress, and the dismissal of charges before trial. Recent case results include: 

Commonwealth v. K. F. – Motion to Suppress granted.

The defendant was arrested and charged with drug charges including Possession with the Intent to Deliver, Conspiracy, and Simple Possession based on a narcotics officer’s allegation that the defendant engaged in four drug transactions. Prosecutors alleged that when arrested, the defendant possessed three bundles of crack cocaine and hundreds of dollars. Attorney Goldstein moved to suppress the drugs and money and argued that the police had not seen the defendant engaged in drug sales. Instead, police had arrested and searched him without probable cause immediately after he exited his house. Despite the officer’s testimony that he personally observed the defendant engage in the four drug sales, Attorney Goldstein successfully cross examined the officer on his credibility and introduced alibi testimony that showed the defendant could not have engaged in narcotics transactions. Immediately following the testimony, the trial judge granted the motion to suppress and threw out the crack cocaine and United States currency.  

Commonwealth v. J. B. – Not Guilty Attempted Murder and Burglary.

The defendant was charged with Attempted Murder for allegedly storming into the complainant’s house and shooting him in front of a number of witnesses. After numerous pre-trial motions and a week-long jury trial, Attorney Mehta successfully obtained an acquittal on the most serious charges of Attempted Murder and Burglary for J. B. despite the testimony that the defendant had intentionally shot the complainant. The defendant was convicted only of lesser charges and faces substantially less time at sentencing.

Commonwealth v. C. P. – Possession with the Intent to Deliver charges dismissed prior to trial in the Philadelphia Municipal Court.

Commonwealth v. B. L. – Successful negotiation for misdemeanor probationary sentence for defendant charged with felony.

B.L was charged with felony Possession with the Intent to Deliver of crack cocaine. When the prosecution realized that Attorney Goldstein was fully prepared to take the case to trial, the prosecution dropped the felony delivery charge, and Attorney Goldstein negotiated a probationary sentence on a misdemeanor simple possession charge for B. L.  

Commonwealth v. E. H. – Gun, conspiracy, and heroin distribution charges were dismissed at the preliminary hearing following Attorney Goldstein’s cross examination of the arresting officer.

Commonwealth v. D.S. – Simple possession charges dismissed prior to trial.

Our attorneys also obtained substantial bail reductions for many other clients who will now be able to fight their cases from home instead of custody. Of course, every case is different, and past successful results should not be read as a guarantee of similar results in other cases. If you or a loved one are facing criminal charges in Pennsylvania or New Jersey, contact the Philadelphia criminal defense lawyers of Goldstein Mehta LLC at 267-225-2545 for a free case evaluation.