Receiving Stolen Property Lawyer | Defending Against Receiving Stolen Property Charges | Philadelphia, PA
Our Defense Lawyers Can Help you With Criminal Cases Involving Stolen Cars and Stolen Firearms
The criminal defense lawyers of Goldstein Mehta LLC have successfully defended countless cases involving Receiving Stolen Property charges. If you are facing any type of theft charge, call 267-225-2545 for a free criminal defense strategy session. We are dedicated professionals who understand what you're going through, care about you and your case, and will use our skill and experience to help.
Receiving Stolen Property ("RSP"), is a very common theft charge which is often brought in Philadelphia state court. The gradation of a Receiving Stolen Property charge may range from a summary offense to a first degree felony depending on the type and value of the property involved. It is extremely common to see Receiving Stolen Property charged when the property involved is a stolen car or motor vehicle of some kind, and Receiving Stolen Property is always graded as a felony of the third degree when the case involves a stolen automobile or other type of motor vehicle. Receiving Stolen Property is also frequently charged when the defendant is found in possession of a stolen gun, but it is extremely difficult for the Commonwealth to prove that the defendant knew the gun was actually stolen.
In general, Receiving Stolen Property involves taking possession of property belonging to someone else knowing that the property was stolen or believing that it was probably stolen. Receiving Stolen Property differs from Theft by Unlawful Taking and other theft offenses in that Commonwealth need not show that the defendant is the person who originally stole the property from its rightful owner. Instead, in order to prove a Receiving Stolen Property case, the Commonwealth must show only that the defendant possessed the property of someone else without permission and the defendant either knew the property was stolen or believed that it was probably stolen.
Is Receiving Stolen Property a Felony or Misdemeanor?
The gradation of Receiving Stolen Property may vary widely depending on the circumstances of the case. Receiving Stolen Property may be graded anywhere from a summary offense to a felony of the first degree. The gradation and severity of the RSP charge depends on the value and type of the property involved. Receiving Stolen Property charges are graded as follows:
Felony of the First Degree: Receiving Stolen Property is a Felony of the First Degree when the property involved is a firearm if the Commonwealth can also show that the defendant is in the business of buying and selling firearms. It is also a Felony of the First Degree if the value of the property involved is $500,000 or more.
Felony of the Second Degree: Receiving Stolen Property is a Felony of the Second Degree if the property involved is a firearm and the defendant is not in the business of buying and selling firearms. Receiving Stolen Property during a natural disaster or war is also graded as a Felony of the Second Degree.
Felony of the Third Degree: Receiving Stolen Property charges involving property worth less than $500,000 but more than $2,000 and the Receiving Stolen Property of a Motor Vehicle are graded as a felony of the third degree. Pennsylvania does not have a crime called "Grand Theft Auto." Instead, the theft or receipt of a stolen car is typically charged as Receiving Stolen Property as a felony of the third degree.
Misdemeanor of the First Degree: RSP of property taken by force or threat or in breach of a fiduciary duty is graded as a Misdemeanor of the First Degree.
Misdemeanor of the Second Degree: RSP of property worth less than $200 but more than $50 is graded as a Misdemeanor of the Second Degree.
Summary Offense: When the property involved is worth less than $50 or the value cannot be determined, then the gradation of a RSP charge is that of a summary offense.
Defenses IN Receiving Stolen Property CASES
Given the nature and value of the property involved, Receiving Stolen Property cases can be very serious. However, there are often defenses to theft charges, and our experienced criminal defense attorneys can evaluate your case for potential defenses. For example, as recognized in the case of Commonwealth v. Matthews, the mere possession of stolen property or property belonging to another does not automatically mean that the possessor of that property is the person who stole or it that they knew it was stolen. This issue comes up frequently when the defendant has been arrested in possession of a car belonging to someone else. For example, the police will pull the defendant over, run the license plate on the car, and receive information from NCIC that the car has been reported stolen. Regardless of whether the defendant has a reasonable explanation for being in possession of the car, the police will often then charge the driver with Receiving Stolen Property and Unauthorized Use of an Automobile.
In this situation, there may be strong defenses to the RSP count. The Matthews case clearly establishes that simply possessing the car is insufficient because the statute also requires the defendant to have known that the car was stolen or believed that it was probably stolen. In determining whether the defendant possessed the requisite knowledge, the court must evaluate the "Matthews factors." These factors include things like whether there is damage to the ignition, the amount of time since the car was reported stolen, and whether the defendant has a reasonable explanation for possessing the car. Alternatively, if the defendant cannot come up with an explanation or attempts to flee, then the defendant is going to be in worse shape when a court considers the factors. Likewise, the case against the defendant will be much weaker if the car was operated with keys and there was no damage to the ignition. All of these factors and a number of others must be considered in order for the prosecution to show that the defendant actually knew the car was stolen and that he or she did not have permission to drive it.
Without evidence of guilty knowledge, the Commonwealth simply cannot prove Receiving Stolen Property beyond a reasonable doubt. Although Matthews dealt with a stolen car, the factors from that case apply to any type of stolen property because of RSP's requirement that the Commonwealth show guilty knowledge. This means that the Matthews factors apply to stolen property like guns, computers, and jewelry. Unless there is something about the property or the defendant's behavior which indicates that the defendant knew or suspected the property as stolen, then the prosecution may have great difficulty proving a case of Receiving Stolen Property.
The valuation of the property is also extremely important in a Receiving Stolen Property case. Pennsylvania law provides a wide range of potential gradations for Receiving Stolen Property charges based on the value of the property. Specifically, the fact that RSP becomes a felony when the property is worth more than $2,000 is significant because it is often possible to show that the property was not really worth that amount at the time that it was stolen. In that case, a Receiving Stolen Property charge will be graded only as a misdemeanor instead of as a felony, and the trial will be heard in the Philadelphia Municipal Court instead of the Court of Common Pleas. Our Philadelphia criminal defense lawyers may be able to use an expert witness to challenge the valuation of the property Finally, first offense theft charges are often eligible for diversionary programs which will allow the defendant to keep a clean record like AMP and ARD. Depending on the case, our experienced criminal lawyers may be able to convince the prosecutor to drop charges or have the charges dismissed pre-trial by showing that our client did not have the requisite guilty knowledge. Alternatively, we may be able to fight the case at trial.
Our Lawyers Can Help With Criminal Charges involving theft and receiving stolen property
The Philadelphia Criminal Defense Attorneys of Goldstein Mehta LLC have had significant success handling all types of theft and Receiving Stolen Property cases. We recognize the issues in Receiving Stolen Property cases and know how to defend these charges. RSP cases are often heard in the Philadelphia Municipal Court, and we have tried hundreds, if not thousands, of cases in that venue. However, even when charged as a misdemeanor, RSP charges are extremely serious due to the potential for damage to a defendant's career and employability. Therefore, if you or a loved one are facing theft charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties, call 267-225-2545 today for a complimentary criminal defense strategy session with one of our attorneys.
RECENT CRIMINAL DEFENSE AWARDS FOR OUR PHILADELPHIA THEFT LAWYERS
CONTACT A PHILADELPHIA RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY LAWYER TODAY
The Receiving Stolen Property Statute
§ 3925. Receiving stolen property.
(a) Offense defined.--A person is guilty of theft if he intentionally receives, retains, or disposes of movable property of another knowing that it has been stolen, or believing that it has probably been stolen, unless the property is received, retained, or disposed with intent to restore it to the owner.
(b) Definition.-- As used in this section the word "receiving" means acquiring possession, control or title, or lending on the security of the property.